The issue of abortion rights has long been a divisive and controversial topic in the world of politics. And with the recent call by Vice President and Democrat presidential nominee Kamala Harris to eliminate the filibuster in order to codify protections for almost unrestricted abortion, the debate has once again been brought to the forefront.
However, what may have seemed like a bold and progressive move by Harris has now backfired as two pro-abortion rights Senators, namely Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, have turned against her.
The Vice President’s statement, made during an interview with Texas Tribune CEO Evan Smith, drew sharp criticism from Manchin and Sinema, both of whom are from states with a significant percentage of pro-life voters. Manchin, who has already been a vocal supporter of the filibuster, expressed his disappointment and disagreement with Harris’ stance. Sinema also echoed similar sentiments, stating that she believes the filibuster promotes bipartisanship and allows for meaningful debate and discussion on important issues.
The backlash against Harris’ call to end the filibuster has not only come from within her own party, but also from pro-life advocates who see it as a dangerous move that could have serious consequences for the future of the country. The potential elimination of the filibuster would mean that a simple majority vote would be enough to pass legislation, effectively removing the need for compromise and cooperation between parties.
This move by Harris has also highlighted the growing divide in the Democratic Party between the more progressive and moderate members. It has been seen as a direct challenge to President Joe Biden’s promise of unity and bipartisanship. And with the slim majority that Democrats currently hold in the Senate, any dissent within the party could potentially be detrimental to their legislative agenda.
Many have also questioned the timing of Harris’ statement, coming at a time when the country is still dealing with the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and its economic repercussions. It has been seen as an attempt to divert attention from the pressing issues at hand and engage in divisive political tactics.
However, Harris’ call for the elimination of the filibuster should not be dismissed outright. Supporters of her stance argue that the filibuster has historically been used to block civil rights legislation and other important measures. They believe that by eliminating it, progress can be made on key issues such as abortion rights.
But the reality is that the filibuster has been an important tool in promoting democracy and protecting minority rights in the Senate. It allows for thorough and thoughtful debate on controversial issues and ensures that legislation is not passed on a whim, but after careful consideration and negotiation.
Furthermore, as Manchin and Sinema have pointed out, the elimination of the filibuster could have far-reaching consequences beyond just the issue of abortion. It could lead to a slippery slope of eroding checks and balances in the Senate and ultimately undermine the democratic process.
In a country where polarizing views on abortion rights exist, there needs to be a careful and respectful approach to finding a middle ground. The call by Harris to eliminate the filibuster is not conducive to this, and it is commendable that Senators Manchin and Sinema have taken a stand against it.
Their actions have been met with praise from both sides of the political spectrum, with many recognizing their bravery in speaking out against their own party’s leadership. It shows a level of independence and integrity that is often missing in today’s political landscape.
In a time where the country is deeply divided and the need for unity and bipartisanship is greater than ever, the move by Harris to eliminate the filibuster only adds to the polarization. It is heartening to see Senators Manchin and Sinema standing up for what they believe in and promoting the importance of cooperation and compromise in politics.
As the debate on abortion rights continues, it is crucial that it is approached with sensitivity and respect for differing opinions. Harris’ call to end the filibuster, although well-intentioned, has only served to deepen the divide. It is now up to the Senate to come together and find a way to protect the rights of all Americans, without resorting to extreme measures that could have dire consequences.