In my new book, “Breaking the Law,” I take a deep dive into the actions of Letitia James, the Attorney General of New York, and her clear bias against President Trump. After extensive research and analysis, I have found eight compelling reasons that prove James had no intention of ever affording the President equal protection under the law.
First and foremost, James has a history of being openly hostile towards President Trump. She has repeatedly called him a “con man” and a “liar,” while also vowing to use her position to “get him.” This type of personal vendetta has no place in the justice system and is a clear indication of James’ bias.
Second, James spearheaded multiple investigations into the President and his business dealings, even before he took office. This is a clear abuse of power and a violation of Trump’s civil rights. As Attorney General, James is meant to uphold the law and protect the rights of all individuals, regardless of their political affiliations.
Third, James has consistently used her position to push her own political agenda. She has openly stated her support for policies and causes that are in direct opposition to the President, such as the Green New Deal and Medicare for All. This raises serious questions about her ability to remain impartial when it comes to President Trump.
Fourth, James has repeatedly made public statements and leaked information about the ongoing investigations into the President. This not only undermines the integrity of the investigations but also violates Trump’s right to due process and a fair trial. As the Attorney General, it is her duty to ensure that the justice system is fair and impartial, not to use it as a tool to further her personal agenda.
Fifth, James has a close relationship with the infamous Michael Avenatti, who represented Stormy Daniels in her case against President Trump. Avenatti was later arrested and convicted for attempting to extort millions of dollars from Nike. The fact that James had a close association with someone who has proven to be untrustworthy and unethical raises serious concerns about her own character and motivations.
Sixth, James has shown a clear bias in her handling of the investigations into the Trump Foundation and the Trump Organization. Despite multiple investigations and years of scrutiny, no evidence of wrongdoing was found. Yet, James has continued to pursue these cases, wasting taxpayer money and resources in an attempt to bring down the President.
Seventh, James has shown a lack of transparency in her dealings with the press and the public. She has refused to provide any updates or information on the ongoing investigations, leaving the public in the dark and fueling speculation and rumors. This lack of transparency only adds to the suspicion surrounding James’ actions and motives.
And finally, the recent bombshell from the Department of Justice has revealed that James may have colluded with the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance to gain access to President Trump’s tax returns. This is a clear violation of his privacy and is yet another example of James’ disregard for the law and the rights of the President.
In conclusion, these eight reasons are just a few examples of the blatant bias and disregard for the rule of law that Letitia James has displayed in her handling of President Trump and his legal affairs. As my book, “Breaking the Law,” details in-depth, James has consistently shown that she had no intention of ever affording the President equal protection under the law. It is time for her to be held accountable for her actions and for justice to be served for President Trump.