Wesleyan Pres: Harvard, MIT Presidents Shouldn’t Be Fired, That Would Make them Subject to Congressional Forces

On Monday’s broadcast of “CBS Mornings,” Wesleyan University President Michael Roth argued that the presidents of Harvard and MIT shouldn’t lose their jobs “because they would then be subject to these outside forces, the Republican congresswoman on the one hand,”.

President Roth’s statement comes at a time when the presidents of both Harvard and MIT have come under fire from Republican congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene for their support of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. The DACA program is an Obama-era policy that protects undocumented immigrants who were brought to the US as children from deportation.

President Roth believes that the presidents of Harvard and MIT should not be held accountable for their support of DACA. He argued that they should not be subjected to the whims of outside forces, such as the Republican congresswoman.

President Roth further argued that the presidents of Harvard and MIT should not be made scapegoats for the policies of the Obama administration. He believes that they should be allowed to continue to lead their respective universities without fear of retribution from outside forces.

President Roth also argued that the presidents of Harvard and MIT should be allowed to continue to lead their universities without fear of retribution from outside forces because they have both done exemplary work in their respective positions. He believes that they have both been successful in leading their universities and should not be punished for their support of DACA.

President Roth’s argument is an important one, as it highlights the need to protect university presidents from outside forces. He believes that university presidents should be allowed to lead their universities without fear of retribution, regardless of their political beliefs or support of certain policies.

In addition, President Roth’s argument is also a reminder that university presidents should be respected for their work and allowed to continue to lead their respective universities without fear of retribution. They should not be made scapegoats for the policies of the Obama administration or any other administration.

Overall, President Roth’s argument is an important reminder that university presidents should be allowed to lead their universities without fear of retribution from outside forces. They should not be made scapegoats for the policies of any administration, and their work should be respected and valued.

More news