May 25, 2012 / Observer 365
Evgeny Orlov was struck off the roll of barristers and solicitors for making allegations which were false or were made without sufficient foundation.
That may have been against judges , but this year he is doing this against any one who gets in the way.
last week I heard that the law society complaint which was ruled in my favour was being heard by the LCRO on appeal from Orlov.
Orlovs approach is to throw as much mud at something as possible and hope that some of it sticks. In the statement of claim he refers to three articles I will explain how they came about International fraud connection with Equity Law.
This item came up as a result of items in naked capitalism the story was entitled New Zealand, Fresh From Its Service to Mexican Drug Lords, Helps Out the Russian Mafia the article relates to companies registered at 44 Khyber pass , I couldn’t help myself not to have a closer look the site reported that:
“Simply searching the register for “44 Khyber Pass” gives 1036 active companies. Evidently this too is a popular address for company registrations, so perhaps that is an overcount. Narrowing the search to the known-to-be-dodgy “Level 4 Khyber Pass” still gives 594 results though. Yikes!“
The companies shown here all link to a common share holder Liliya SOBOLEVA, orlov’s common law wife and business partner.
Please note Lilyas name is mentioned because she was the ultimate share holder of these companies, many of these companies were involved the panama papers . The New Zealand companies register records her signature as consent to being the director and share holder of the companies , this information is real and verifiable . This website is called transparency and we provide that . we are not accusing her of anything simply pointing out factual evidence . She signed the legal documents they are available on the companies register
A man in Majorca who corresponds with me with regards to fraud sent me the article regarding Erik Vanagels and indeed he comes up in our own press Boozy Latvian ‘billionaire’ is smokescreen for fraud and Fraud trail leads to OAP’s tiny flat then as luck would have it I received an email from a freind she had received an email from Equity trust International. and The post News Flash EQUITY TRUST solicits new clients went up .
Was it my fault that Liliya Soboleva was the ultimate share holder together with Greg Stewart ?after each posting I sent an email to Orlov and asked him if there was anything which was inaccurate and required changing. On each occasion he did not suggest changes.
On the Anti corruption web site there was a third postNew Zealand a soft touch with Fraudsters and money launderers . no matter how many times I read the stories I cant see how they are defamatory.
Item 20 states the items remain published on the web sites.. yes they do they are true of public interest , news worthy and they are not there to attack any one .
Item 21 statement of claim “In their natural and ordinary meaning, the said words were meant and were understood to mean that the Plaintiffs were jointly and severally intentionally involved in illegal or unlawful business and/or money laundering and /or fraud and /or tax evasion and /or were connected with The Russian Mafia and/or organized crime.” what words eh entire posts surely not !! cant a person say here is a news item this is the company it refers to and here are the ultimate owners ? that can be deduced from public record
Item 22 Statement of claim “Further and or alternatively the said words bore and were understood to bear the meaning pleaded in paragraph 19 above by way of innuendo“. .. what the heck paragraph 19 states ” 19. The First and Second Defendants caused to be published or published on the website mentioned in paragraph [16] one article whose text and dates of publication are particularised below.
In my experiences when people are overly touchy it means that you have hit a nerve , I would think that if I was to provide a trust service and then realize that the overseas directors have bad press, I would sway away from them .Instead Equity international sends out a new Flyer stating that they will set up New Zealand companies for foreigners, they dont appear to do due diligence as to who their directors are .
Back to the statement of claim
Paragraph 25 ” The publication of the statements set out in paragraph 17 is continuing as they remain published on the website.” What statements ????? 17.The Second and Third Defendants jointly control and administer the
content of a website titled Transparency International New Zealand.
Paragraph 26 the statements are false – so the statements in paragraph 17 are false ok I agree the statement referred to is 17.The Second and Third Defendants jointly control and administer the content of a website titled Transparency International New Zealand. and it is false totally false
From: Grace Haden [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, 21 June 2013 10:59 a.m.
To: ‘Evgeny Orlov’
Subject: RE: updates on Equity law trusts
Eugine
What is published is merely a collation of what has been found on company records and international press
Basically Eugine you would not have been mentioned if you were not connected with the story which was sent to me as attached but when lillia has so many companies and they are involved in international news items I can’t help but mention that you are her husband and that equity law is the registered address.
In short Eugine section 25 of the defamation act sets out the requirements
If anything is inaccurate could you please let me know.
Did you take defamation action against the news paper who published the item I referred to , I can if you like not refer to the news paper item but refer to the judgment instead.
I look forward to hearing from you before Friday next week, being the statutory time frame . I will be more than happy to retract anything which is inconsistent with the facts which I have referred to when you supply evidence that what I have linked to quoted or have said is untrue.
It is apparent from the fees you charge that you have more than enough money to settle with me , I have not breached the court agreement as I have not refereed to anything which went down between us.
By the way if that settlement offer you phoned me about is last year still open would love to hear from you ..
Regards
Grace Haden